Author: Michael George
Created: 21 Dec 2023
Alpha racing is a merging of GPS technology with the natural back and forth sailing done by most sailboarders around the world. It uses the power of GPS and computing to calculate your best average speed from any point through a gybe and back to the same point.
There are only two rules in Alpha Racing:
Alpha 500 is one of the standard speed categories when speedsurfing, where the proximity distance is 50m and the maximum distance covered is 500m.
The image below shows two examples of an alpha 500:
The proximity distance and maximum distance are applied to the data to determine when alphas have occurred; 50m and 500m respectively.
The examples from above have been annotated below, showing the significance of the 50m proximity detection.
It is worth noting that position and speed are calculated independently by GPS receivers and that at any point in time a GPS receiver will know either the position, speed, neither, or both.
Once the start and end times have been determined for possible alphas, speeds are calculated between the start and end points. This is simply a matter of calculating the arithmetic mean during that period of time.
An issue has been observed on the COROS VERTIX 2 and the COROS APEX 2 Pro which results in “fantasy alphas”. These are not genuine results and have been seen to boost peoples alphas by up to 10 knots.
The exact nature of the COROS bug is unknown, but the problem can clearly be seen when examining data within a FIT file.
A simple graph comparing speeds calculated from the positional data (green) and doppler data (red) is show below.
Within problem tracks, speeds calculated from the positional data (green) and doppler data (red) are offset.
You will recall that the positional data is used to determine when the alpha occurred but the doppler speeds are used for the actual result.
The fact that positional data and doppler speeds are offset causes “fantasy alphas” to occur, as in the example below which is awarding a 24.41 knots “fantasy alpha” (red) when the actual alpha was more like 18.71 knots (green).
It is not clear whether COROS is failing to capture the NMEA data from the GNSS receiver correctly in real-time, or whether they are mangling it in their downstream processing.
What is very clear is that the data that they are recording is incorrect, primarily with positions and speeds being temporally offset. The issue has been observed right from the start of tracks, and also starting half way into a session.
Here are two example FIT files from a VERTIX 2:
My suspicion is that COROS are combining NMEA sentences, but not doing it correctly. The obvious way to capture position and speed is using the RMC sentence (time, position and speed) but COROS may be using GGA (time and position) and VTG (speed).
The issue could be related to VTG sentences not including a timestamp, or due to some messages being absent for a period of time. It’s not easy to determine the root cause solely from the FIT files, so COROS need to investigate.
Whatever the cause, COROS need to fix this issue as the VERTIX 2 and APEX 2 Pro are sometimes logging bad data and causing spurious alpha’s to appear in our rankings.